Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH wireless-next 4/8] wifi: wlcore: pass "status" to wlcore_hw_convert_fw_status()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/28/2024 12:17 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
wlcore_fw_status() is passed a pointer to the struct wl_fw_status to
decode the status into, which is always wl->fw_status. Rather than
referencing wl->fw_status within wlcore_fw_status(), use the supplied
argument so that we access this member in a consistent manner.

Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
index a98b26dc3cb8..3defe49c5120 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static int wlcore_fw_status(struct wl1271 *wl, struct wl_fw_status *status)
   	if (ret < 0)
   		return ret;
- wlcore_hw_convert_fw_status(wl, wl->raw_fw_status, wl->fw_status);
+	wlcore_hw_convert_fw_status(wl, wl->raw_fw_status, status);
wl1271_debug(DEBUG_IRQ, "intr: 0x%x (fw_rx_counter = %d, "
   		     "drv_rx_counter = %d, tx_results_counter = %d)",
--
2.30.2

Agree this is more consistent. Maybe *status shouldn't be an argument to wlcore_fw_status at all? It's called only in one place with wl->fw_status anyway.

Michael.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux