On 5/10/24 19:57, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2024-05-09 at 09:52 +0530, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote:
On 5/7/24 00:43, Johannes Berg wrote:
At some point we thought perhaps this could be per link, but
really that didn't happen, and it's confusing. Radar detection
still uses the deflink to allocate the channel, but the work
need not be there. Move it back.
I'm currently working on MLO DFS support. It is better if the work can
be left in per link structure. With proper support, instead of deflink
it will use appropriate link.
A number of patches I have actually depend on this (though only by
patch, not semantically), so it might be better to leave it and just
move it back.
Oh I see :)
In any case, your work will likely have (simple) conflicts in some
places with the other patches I posted.
Yes correct. Those are minor as far as I saw them and those seems fine
as well. But this one, felt like I will be reverting it soon so if
possible let's not merge it unless it is affecting the code base.
But we have a couple of weeks to decide, I guess, given the release is
around the corner.
Sure. I'm doing testing as of now with my changes so it will take some
time to appear here. If your changes gets merged by then, I will rebase it.
