Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH RFC] wifi: cfg80211: Refactor interface combination input parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/7/2024 3:17 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 08:45 +0530, Karthikeyan Periyasamy wrote:
Currently, the interface combination input parameter num_different_channels
and iftype_num are directly filled in by the caller under the assumption
that all channels and interfaces belong to a single hardware device. This
assumption is incorrect for multi-device interface combinations because
each device supports a different set of channels and interfaces. As
discussed in [1], need to refactor the input parameters to encode enough
data to handle both single and multiple device interface combinations.
This can be achieved by encoding the frequency and interface type under
the interface entity itself. With this new input parameter structure, the
cfg80211 can classify and construct the device parameters, then verify them
against the device specific interface combinations.

...


+/**
+ * struct iface_combination_iface_link - Interface combination link parameter
+ *
+ * Used to pass link specific interface combination parameters
+ *
+ * @freq: center frequency used for verification against the different channels
+ */
+struct iface_combination_iface_link {
+	u32 freq;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct iface_combination_interface - Interface parameter for iface combination
+ *
+ * Used to pass interface specific parameter for iface combination
+ *
+ * @iftype: interface type as specified in &enum nl80211_iftype.
+ * @links: array with the number of link parameter used for verification
+ * @num_link: the length of the @links parameter used in this interface
+ */
+struct iface_combination_interface {
+	enum nl80211_iftype iftype;
+	struct iface_combination_iface_link links[IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS];
+	u8 num_link;

Might be simpler (for the producers at least, but not really much more
difficult for the consumer) to just remove num_link, use the link ID as
the index, and declare freq==0 means unused?

Previously user able to check the iface combination with the new interface/channel creation independently with separate input parameter as below without knowing the frequency of the interface.

       params.num_different_channels = 1;

       for_each_vap(...)
             params.iftype_num[iftype]++;


when the user not aware of the channel but still they want to check the new channel creation possible scenario, in that case they just fill the dummy freq as zero and fill the num_link as 1 for all the interfaces.

So freq=0 is used here.


--
Karthikeyan Periyasamy
--
கார்த்திகேயன் பெரியசாமி




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux