The assignment of the else and if branches is the same, so the else here is redundant, so we remove it. ./drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c:6406:2-4: WARNING: possible condition with no effect (if == else). Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=8812 Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c index eaa18140d1a8..ca5a098c30a4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c @@ -6403,10 +6403,7 @@ enum rtw89_rf_path_bit rtw89_phy_get_kpath(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, return RF_D; case MLO_0_PLUS_2_1RF: case MLO_2_PLUS_0_1RF: - if (phy_idx == RTW89_PHY_0) - return RF_AB; - else - return RF_AB; + return RF_AB; case MLO_0_PLUS_2_2RF: case MLO_2_PLUS_0_2RF: case MLO_2_PLUS_2_2RF: -- 2.20.1.7.g153144c
