Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 06/13] wifi: nl80211: send iface combination to user space in multi-hardware wiphy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 4/15/2024 7:57 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 10:57 +0530, Karthikeyan Periyasamy wrote:
+ * @NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_LIMITS: nested attribute
containing the
+ *    limits for the given interface types, see
+ *    &enum nl80211_iface_limit_attrs.
+ * @NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_MAXIMUM: u32 attribute giving the
maximum
+ *    number of interfaces that can be created in this group. This
number
+ *    does not apply to the interfaces purely managed in software.
+ * @NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_NUM_CHANNELS: u32 attribute
specifying the
+ *    number of different channels that can be used in this group.
+ * @NUM_NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB: number of attributes
+ * @MAX_NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB: highest attribute number
+ */
+enum nl80211_if_comb_per_hw_comb_attrs {
+    NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_UNSPEC,
+    NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_HW_IDX,
+    NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_LIMITS,
+    NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_MAXIMUM,
+    NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_NUM_CHANNELS,

Almost all these attributes duplicate - including their docs -
attributes from enum nl80211_if_combination_attrs. Is it really worth
doing that, rather than adding NL80211_IFACE_COMB_HW_IDX and documenting
the different uses of the attribute set?


I agree, more duplication. So we have to have the per_hw_comb_attrs
defines like below?

enum nl80211_if_comb_per_hw_comb_attrs {
      NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_UNSPEC,
      NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_HW_IDX =
              NL80211_IFACE_COMB_NUM_CHANNELS + 1,
      /* keep last */
      NUM_NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB,
      MAX_NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB =
              NUM_NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB - 1
};


I agree this approach. Instead of NUM_NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB,
shall we have MAX_NL80211_IFACE_COMB like below so that hw_idx attribute
value will not get conflict to any IFACE combination attributes

   enum nl80211_if_comb_per_hw_comb_attrs {
        NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_UNSPEC,
        NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB_HW_IDX =
                MAX_NL80211_IFACE_COMB + 1,
        /* keep last */
        NUM_NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB,
        MAX_NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB =
                NUM_NL80211_IFACE_COMB_PER_HW_COMB - 1
};


You haven't thought this through - what happens here if something is
added to enum nl80211_if_combination_attrs?


Yeah, it break backward compatibility.

--
Karthikeyan Periyasamy
--
கார்த்திகேயன் பெரியசாமி




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux