On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 14:24 -0800, reinette chatre wrote: > > I suppose the probability of the beacon interval changing is rather low, > > but should we propagate the error in that case rather than just using > > -EINVAL? > > I do not understand. By returning -EINVAL the error is propagated up to > nl80211 from where the call came. Ah, but the error code is lost, the driver might have returned -EBUSY or something. I'm not sure we want to pass that up, it might be better not to, not sure. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
