On Thursday 04 December 2008 13:44:09 Stefanik Gábor wrote: > BTW using RTL8187B's scaling constants for RTL8187L also work well > with this patch - I get almost identical readings from my BCM4318 and > my RTL8187L. (I haven't yet submitted my version of the patch because > it's pretty messy, with #if 0'd code and such.) I wonder whether b43 > or p54usb is more correct... However, it looks like the same algorithm > is applicable for both RTL8187 variants. > probably b43. p54usb uses static scaling constants to calculate signal & noise dbm, instead of finding the correct values from the device eeprom (Note: Link Quality doesn't substract the noise so it could be off even more). However, in my testing it was only a few +/- dbm(s), what's your reading? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
