On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 11:57 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:53:33 +0100 Johannes Berg wrote: > > I suppose we could even define a > > > > nla_for_each_type(..., type) > > That's probably a good idea for the kernel! We already have a bunch of > the loops with the if (type != DESIRED) continue, as you mentioned. https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328203144.b5a6c895fb80.I1869b44767379f204998ff44dd239803f39c23e0@changeid :P johannes
