On 3/28/2024 7:41 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > I was almost going to write "links" instead of "interfaces" there, which > reminds me that none of this really even works well for MLO yet. Not > sure if that's better addressed as a separate first step? we are following the sequence: 1) go from per-hw wiphy to wiphy that supports multi-hw (multiple patchsets under review) 2) add hw-to-wiphy grouping infrastructure (hopefully coming soon) 3) add MLO on top of the grouping infrastructure So we consider this to be part of the 1st phase
