Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: allocate dummy net_device dynamically

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 09:05:24AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 3/19/2024 3:47 AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > @@ -3687,6 +3690,8 @@ struct ath10k *ath10k_core_create(size_t priv_size, struct device *dev,
> >  
> >  err_free_coredump:
> >  	ath10k_coredump_destroy(ar);
> > +err_free_netdev:
> > +	free_netdev(ar->napi_dev);
> >  err_free_tx_complete:
> >  	destroy_workqueue(ar->workqueue_tx_complete);
> >  err_free_aux_wq:
> > @@ -3708,6 +3713,7 @@ void ath10k_core_destroy(struct ath10k *ar)
> >  
> >  	destroy_workqueue(ar->workqueue_tx_complete);
> >  
> > +	free_netdev(ar->napi_dev);
> >  	ath10k_debug_destroy(ar);
> >  	ath10k_coredump_destroy(ar);
> >  	ath10k_htt_tx_destroy(&ar->htt);
> 
> looks like there is a pre-existing issue that the order of operations in
> _destroy() doesn't match the order of operations in the _create() error path.

Right. I found it weird as well. Basically "ath10k_coredump" and
"ath10k_debug" operations are swapped between ath10k_core_create() and
ath10k_core_destroy().

If you wish, I can submit a patch ordering it properly.

> but the placement of your changes looks ok to me

Right. It is done in-between the workqueues and the coredump/debug
creation/destroy.

Thanks for the review.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux