Kalle, On 18/03/2024 17:16, Kalle Valo wrote: > Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Per filesystems/sysfs.rst, show() should only use sysfs_emit() >> or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the value to be returned to user space. >> >> coccinelle complains that there are still a couple of functions that use >> snprintf(). Convert them to sysfs_emit(). >> >> sprintf() will be converted as weel if they have. >> >> Generally, this patch is generated by >> make coccicheck M=<path/to/file> MODE=patch \ >> COCCI=scripts/coccinelle/api/device_attr_show.cocci >> >> No functional change intended >> >> CC: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> V2: subject updated >> >> This is a part of the work "Fix coccicheck device_attr_show warnings"[1] >> Split them per subsystem so that the maintainer can review it easily >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240116041129.3937800-1-lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx/ >> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Please resubmit the whole patchset as v3. May I know what's wrong with this V2? or what update should I do in V3 > Even if just one patch has changed in a patch series resubmit the whole patchset (and remember to increase the version number), do not just resubmit that one changed patch. The reason is that it's difficult to apply patches in correct order when some of them are submitted separately. I thought I had followed this rule. Feel free to let me know if I missed something Thanks Zhijian > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#resubmit_the_whole_patchset > >
