From: Shaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@xxxxxxxxx>
Do not call iwl_mvm_mld_get_primary_link if only one link
is active.
In that case, the sole active link should be used.
iwl_mvm_mld_get_primary_link returns -1 if only one link
is active causing a warnning.
Fixes: 8c9bef26e98b ("wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: d3: implement suspend with MLO")
Signed-off-by: Shaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/d3.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/d3.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/d3.c
index ca2c6d0b605e..1a235b0c5593 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/d3.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/d3.c
@@ -1260,15 +1260,15 @@ static int __iwl_mvm_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(vif))
return 1;
- if (ieee80211_vif_is_mld(vif) && vif->cfg.assoc) {
+ if (hweight16(vif->active_links) > 1) {
/*
- * Select the 'best' link. May need to revisit, it seems
- * better to not optimize for throughput but rather range,
- * reliability and power here - and select 2.4 GHz ...
+ * Select the 'best' link.
+ * May need to revisit, it seems better to not optimize
+ * for throughput but rather range, reliability and
+ * power here - and select 2.4 GHz ...
*/
- primary_link =
- iwl_mvm_mld_get_primary_link(mvm, vif,
- vif->active_links);
+ primary_link = iwl_mvm_mld_get_primary_link(mvm, vif,
+ vif->active_links);
if (WARN_ONCE(primary_link < 0, "no primary link in 0x%x\n",
vif->active_links))
@@ -1277,6 +1277,8 @@ static int __iwl_mvm_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
ret = ieee80211_set_active_links(vif, BIT(primary_link));
if (ret)
return ret;
+ } else if (vif->active_links) {
+ primary_link = __ffs(vif->active_links);
} else {
primary_link = 0;
}
--
2.34.1
