On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 11:11 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Would it be too much trouble to add this via cfg80211/nl80211 instead > or at least add both? The more we can push in that direction the > better. That would be good, but I don't think it's really a requirement right now since wext has the API we need already. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
