Am Montag, 1. Dezember 2008 schrieb Marcel Holtmann: > Hi Helmut, > > > > > > Nevertheless, I'm wondering if the current behaviour (even with the patch above) > > > > > makes much sense. I mean, the user space cannot rely on the rfkill state > > > > > unless an appropriate interface is up. As the device is able to report the > > > > > killswitch state without firmware being loaded the following approach could > > > > > be feasible: > > > > > - iwl_pci_probe enables the device and enables the interrupts > > > > > - iwl_mac_start just loads the firmware > > > > > - iwl_mac_stop just releases the firmware but leaves the interrupts enabled > > > > > > > > In 3495 rfkill interrupt is not available and rfkill state is > > > > delivered only when firmware is loaded, therefore this is not > > > > possible to bring device down and also expect rfill switch event. > > > > There were few threads about this subject. > > > > In 4965 and 5000 this will work > > > > > > do we unregister the rfkill switch when bringing the adapter down. > > > > No. > > > > > If not, then we might should do that. I don't see a point in exposing a > > > rfkill switch if we can't do anything with it. > > > > Either that, or make the rfkill usable even when the interface is down. > > if the hardware/firmware doesn't allow us to do so, we have no real > option. Ah, you're talking about 3945. Missed that. Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
