"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, at 10:23, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>
>> On 2/14/2024 9:45 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> An old cleanup went a little too far and causes a warning with clang-16
>>>> and higher as it breaks control flow integrity (KCFI) rules:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy_shim.c:64:34: error: cast from 'void (*)(struct brcms_phy *)' to 'void (*)(void *)' converts to incompatible function type [-Werror,-Wcast-function-type-strict]
>>>> 64 | brcms_init_timer(physhim->wl, (void (*)(void *))fn,
>>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> Change this one instance back to passing a void pointer so it can be
>>>> used with the timer callback interface.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: d89a4c80601d ("staging: brcm80211: removed void * from softmac phy")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> I guess this should go to wireless tree?
>>
>> This has been like this forever looking at the "staging" part in the
>> Fixes tag. Is it really so urgent now? On the other hand I have no real
>> problem with moving this to the wireless tree. Just wondering out loud.
>
> It's probably fine either way. Some maintainers like to backport
> the warning fixes to stable kernels, others don't. Since the
> warning is currently only enabled at W=1 level, it's probably fine
> to fix it for linux-next only, but if we want the fix backported,
> it should also go into 6.8.
Thanks, let's take it wireless-next then.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
