On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 01:11 +0100, Carlos Laué wrote: > OK, I thought we cannot guarantee the automatic power regulation, > using lower values for now, it would be nice to implement the required > mechanism to assure tx power regulation, but then how to define the > two values? two tables, or a flag like "NO-APC -3" indicating that, > without tx power regulation, there is a lower limit for tx power? No, it's not that trivial, needs more thought and a db change. > And the patch: I think you forgot something. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
