On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 15:48 +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > If we're scanning and got the control frame with zero rate mask, drop > the frame before '__rate_control_send_low()' getting stuck attempting > to select supported rate. But why drop the frame? I'm still thinking that it just doesn't really make sense to apply the rate mask to scanning at all? The most common use case for this is probably P2P-style things where you just don't want to use CCK, but for scanning we have NL80211_ATTR_TX_NO_CCK_RATE for this, so there's really no need to apply the rate mask? johannes
