Hi there Chen-Yu, On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:35 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 9:25 PM Andrew Yong <me@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > - Update regulatory rules for September 2023 IMDA TS SRD [1] > > - Enable 5945 - 6425 MHz (Wi-Fi 6E) band per legislation > > - Switch units from dBm to mW to match values listed in legislation > > - Allow AUTO-BW between 5470 - 5850 MHz to permit additional 160 MHz BW options > > > > [1] https://www.imda.gov.sg/-/media/imda/files/regulation-licensing-and-consultations/ict-standards/telecommunication-standards/radio-comms/imdatssrd.pdf > > Thanks for the patch! > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Yong <me@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > db.txt | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > > index fdc2c13..cbe1a88 100644 > > --- a/db.txt > > +++ b/db.txt > > @@ -1584,25 +1584,27 @@ country SE: DFS-ETSI > > # 60 GHz band channels 1-4 (ETSI EN 302 567) > > (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40) > > > > -# https://www.imda.gov.sg/-/media/Imda/Files/Regulation-Licensing-and-Consultations/ICT-Standards/Telecommunication-Standards/Radio-Comms/IMDATSSRD.pdf > > -# IMDA TS SRD, Issue 1 Revision 1, April 2019, subsequently "IMDA TS SRD" > > -# 2400 - 2483.5 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 (25); ANSI C63.10-2013 and FCC Part 15 Section 15.247 or EN 300 328 > > -# 5150 - 5350 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 (29); FCC Part 15 Section 15.407 (1) 5.15-5.25 GHz (2) 5.25-5.35 GHz; EN 301 893 > > -# 5470 - 5725 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 (30); FCC Part 15 Section 15.407 (2) 5.47-5.725 GHz; EN 301 893 > > -# 5725 - 5850 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 (27); FCC Part 15 Section 15.247; FCC Part 15 Section 15.407 (3) 5.725-5.85 GHz > > -# 57000 - 66000 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 (31); ETSI EN 302 567 > > -# Note: 27dBm for 5470-5725MHz bands is 3dBm reduction per FCC Part 15 Section 15.407 (2) 5.47-5.725 GHz; EN 301 893 as referenced by IMDA TS SRD > > +# https://www.imda.gov.sg/-/media/imda/files/regulation-licensing-and-consultations/ict-standards/telecommunication-standards/radio-comms/imdatssrd.pdf > > +# IMDA TS SRD, Issue 1 Revision 3, Sep 2023, subsequently "IMDA TS SRD" > > +# 2400 - 2483.5 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 Sub-band 32e > > +# 5150 - 5350 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 Sub-band 33a > > +# 5470 - 5725 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 Sub-band 34 > > +# 5725 - 5850 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 Sub-band 35 > > +# 5945 - 6425 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 Sub-band 45b > > +# 57000 - 66000 MHz: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 Sub-band 40 > > +# Note: 500mW for 5470-5725MHz bands per FCC Part 15 Section 15.407 (2) 5.47-5.725 GHz as referenced by IMDA TS SRD > > # AU and BG regulatory domains use the same interpretation of cited FCC and ETSI standards > > -# Note: The transmit power for 5250-5350MHz bands can be raised by 3dBm when TPC is implemented: IMDA TS SRD Table 1 (29) > > -# Note: The transmit power for 5470-5725MHz bands can be raised by 3dBm when TPC is implemented: IMDA TS SRD Table 1 (30) > > +# Note: The transmit power for 5250-5350MHz bands can be raised by 3dBm when TPC is implemented: IMDA TS SRD, Table 1 Sub-band 33a > > +# Note: The transmit power for 5470-5725MHz bands can be raised by 3dBm when TPC is implemented: IMDA TS SRD Table 1 Sub-band 34 > > "... raised by 100 mW ..." given the new units? Ack, will amend in v2. > > Also, such a provision is not given for 5470-5725MHz in the spec. My > interpretation of the text is that a "reference" is referencing other > regulations for "reference" when designing the local rules, not that it > allows following those references directly, unless explicitly noted. >From the parallel discussion at [1], it sounds like this has been the interpretation used for multiple regdomains, e.g. AU. IMHO, it would be outside of the scope of this patch which implements changes since the last Singapore regulation release. I would prefer a separate patch to comment out 5470-5725MHz, which can later be reverted/uncommented once a decision is reached. Though my opinion would be that a separate patchset that universally addresses all the interpreted/grey-area TPC offsets, would be more appropriate, once that decision is reached. Anyway, I'll defer to your decision as the maintainer; I'll keep this band in my patchv2 meanwhile and do a v3 if I'm not in time for your decision. > > > country SG: DFS-FCC > > - (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (23) > > - (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (23), AUTO-BW > > - (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (20), DFS, AUTO-BW > > - (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (27), DFS > > - (5725 - 5850 @ 80), (30) > > - (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40) > > + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (200 mW) > > + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), AUTO-BW > > + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), DFS, AUTO-BW > > + (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (500 mW), DFS, AUTO-BW > > This needs more justification. Unlike for the 5.15 ~ 5.35 GHz range, > the standard does _not_ give an option without TPC for this band. > > > + (5725 - 5850 @ 80), (1000 mW), AUTO-BW As above. > > Instead of AUTO-BW here, can you follow the examples from TW and US of > expanding the previous band by 5 MHz? That should cover the 160 MHz > channel. Ack, will amend in v2. Thanks for reviewing. Andrew [1] https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2024-January/001490.html > > > ChenYu > > > + (5945 - 6425 @ 320), (250 mW), NO-OUTDOOR > > + (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (10000 mW) > > > > # SI as part of EU/CEPT accepted decisions 2005/513/EC (5GHz RLAN, EN 301 893) > > # and 2006/771/EC (amended by 2008/432/EC, Short-Range Devices, EN 300 440) > > -- > > 2.41.0 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > wireless-regdb mailing list > > wireless-regdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
