On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 14:03 -0800, Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 12/20/2023 3:41 AM, Miri Korenblit wrote: > > From: Andrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > FCC-594280 D01 Section B.3 allows peer-to-peer and ad hoc devices to > > operate on DFS channels while they operate under the control of a > > concurrent DFS master. For example, it is possible to have a P2P GO on a > > DFS channel as long as BSS connection is active on the same channel. > > Allow such operation by adding additional regulatory flags to indicate > > DFS concurrent channels and capable devices. Add the required > > relaxations in DFS regulatory checks. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@xxxxxxxxx> > > Curious if there will be a companion change to wireless-regdb.git to > allow this flag to be set in db.txt? > > Looks like we haven't been very good about adding support for new > nl80211_reg_rule_flags to dbparse.py. > Yeah, we really haven't, and it seems that nobody really cares any more, since all the new devices have self-managed regulatory? Certainly that's true for our device, so even if we were to add a flag and all to everything related to the regdb, it'd have no effect for Intel NICs. So the interest is pretty low ... johannes
