On 12/7/2023 11:15 AM, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote:
On 12/4/23 13:43, Baochen Qiang wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.h
@@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ struct ath11k_vif
*ath11k_mac_get_arvif_by_vdev_id(struct ath11k_base *ab,
u8 ath11k_mac_get_target_pdev_id(struct ath11k *ar);
u8 ath11k_mac_get_target_pdev_id_from_vif(struct ath11k_vif *arvif);
struct ath11k_vif *ath11k_mac_get_vif_up(struct ath11k_base *ab);
-
Irrelevant change?
struct ath11k *ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_vdev_id(struct ath11k_base *ab,
u32 vdev_id);
struct ath11k *ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_pdev_id(struct ath11k_base *ab,
u32 pdev_id);
void ath11k_mac_drain_tx(struct ath11k *ar);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.c
index 6f0a35fcc9c1..9a0568676a74 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.c
@@ -9858,3 +9858,9 @@ int ath11k_wmi_sta_keepalive(struct ath11k *ar,
return ath11k_wmi_cmd_send(wmi, skb, WMI_STA_KEEPALIVE_CMDID);
}
+
+bool ath11k_wmi_supports_6ghz_cc_ext(struct ath11k *ar)
+{
+ return (test_bit(WMI_TLV_SERVICE_REG_CC_EXT_EVENT_SUPPORT,
+ ar->ab->wmi_ab.svc_map)) && ar->supports_6ghz;
What is the use of first parenthesis? I don't see a closing one after
ar->supports_6ghz so its just guarding test_bit() which is not required.
I believe intention here was to guard whole expression?
I don't see an need to guard the whole expression or the test_bit(), so
will drop extra parenthesis in V9.
