On Tue, Dec 5, 2023, at 16:53, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 08:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.5 release. >> There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 03:14:57 +0000. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.5-rc1.gz >> or in the git tree and branch at: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y >> and the diffstat can be found below. >> > > The x86 allmodconfig with gcc-8 failed but passed with gcc-13. > > x86_64: gcc-8-allmodconfig: FAILED > x86_64: gcc-13-allmodconfig: PASS Note that at the moment gcc-13 (also 11 and 12) turns off the -Warray-bounds checks because of excessive false positives, see 0da6e5fd6c37 ("gcc: disable '-Warray-bounds' for gcc-13 too"). I have not yet figured out what gcc-8 complains about, but I assume that gcc-13 would find the same thing with the check enabled. Arnd
