On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 07:50 -0800, Yury Norov wrote: > iwlegacy and iwlwifi code opencodes atomic bit allocation/traversing by > using loops. That's really just due to being lazy though, it could use a non-atomic __test_and_set_bit() would be just fine in all of this, there's always a mutex held around it that protects the data. Not that it means that the helper is _wrong_, it's just unnecessary, and you don't have non-atomic versions of these, do you? johannes
