Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> >> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Use iftype for interface type switch in mt7925_init_he_caps routine
>> >> >
>> >> > Fixes: c948b5da6bbe ("wifi: mt76: mt7925: add Mediatek Wi-Fi7 driver
>> >> > for mt7925 chips")
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> What issue does this fix? In other words, what are the user visible
>> >> symptoms?
>> >
>> > Since we are using i (equal to 8 after the for loop above) instead of iftype
>> > we are missing some HE capabilities exposed to userspace (we are hitting the
>> > switch default branch). I agree this is something not so harmful and we can
>> > apply this fix to Felix's tree instead, up to you.
>>
>> No no, this is fine for the wireless tree :) I just want to document if
>> this is fixing a real issue which users can see or just a theoretical
>> fix you found during code review. It makes handling fixes a lot easier
>> when we have this documented in the commit message.
>>
>> No need to resend because of this, I can update the commit log if you
>> tell me what to add.
>
> ack, thx. I will more 'verbose' next time :)
But what I should add to the commit message? Is this just a theoretical
fix you found during code review? Or was there a bug report which
prompted you to fix this?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
