[+CC Manikanta Pubbisetty ] As Johannes[1] pointed out, this `memset()` is probably unnecessary: ./drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c: 8920 memset(skb->data, 0, sizeof(*cmd)); However, the same exact issue[2] is present at the line below inside function `ath10k_wmi_alloc_skb()`: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c: 1799 memset(skb->data, 0, round_len); Thanks -- Gustavo [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/26b15f4702cef17fe70b496a62f03735874bd16a.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/07e9bb04-f9fc-46d5-bfb9-a00a63a707c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ On 10/24/23 13:50, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi all, While working on tranforming one-element array `peer_chan_list` in `struct wmi_tdls_peer_capabilities` into a flex-array member 7187 struct wmi_tdls_peer_capabilities { ... 7199 struct wmi_channel peer_chan_list[1]; 7200 } __packed; the following line caught my attention: ./drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c: 8920 memset(skb->data, 0, sizeof(*cmd)); Notice that before the flex-array transformation, we are zeroing 128 bytes in `skb->data` because `sizeof(*cmd) == 128`, see below: $ pahole -C wmi_10_4_tdls_peer_update_cmd drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.o struct wmi_10_4_tdls_peer_update_cmd { __le32 vdev_id; /* 0 4 */ struct wmi_mac_addr peer_macaddr; /* 4 8 */ __le32 peer_state; /* 12 4 */ __le32 reserved[4]; /* 16 16 */ struct wmi_tdls_peer_capabilities peer_capab; /* 32 96 */ /* size: 128, cachelines: 2, members: 5 */ }; So, after the flex-array transformation (and the necessary adjustments to a few other lines of code) we would be zeroing 104 bytes in `skb->data` because `sizeof(*cmd) == 104`, see below: $ pahole -C wmi_10_4_tdls_peer_update_cmd drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.o struct wmi_10_4_tdls_peer_update_cmd { __le32 vdev_id; /* 0 4 */ struct wmi_mac_addr peer_macaddr; /* 4 8 */ __le32 peer_state; /* 12 4 */ __le32 reserved[4]; /* 16 16 */ struct wmi_tdls_peer_capabilities peer_capab; /* 32 72 */ /* size: 104, cachelines: 2, members: 5 */ /* last cacheline: 40 bytes */ }; This difference arises because the size of the element type for the `peer_chan_list` array, which is `sizeof(struct wmi_channel) == 24 ` $ pahole -C wmi_channel drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.o struct wmi_channel { __le32 mhz; /* 0 4 */ __le32 band_center_freq1; /* 4 4 */ __le32 band_center_freq2; /* 8 4 */ [..] /* 20 4 */ /* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 6 */ /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */ }; is included in `sizeof(*cmd)` before the transformation. So, my question is: do we really need to zero out those extra 24 bytes in `skb->data`? or is it rather a bug in the original code? Thanks! -- Gustavo