[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 22.09.23 13:22, Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > > On 21.09.23 07:02, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >> On středa 26. července 2023 11:17:02 CEST Felix Fietkau wrote: >>> The IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_EXT_NSS_BW value already indicates support for half-NSS >>> 160 MHz support, so it is wrong to also advertise full 160 MHz support. > [...] >> and this broke my mt7915-based AP. >> >> However, if I remove `[VT160]` capability from the hostapd config, things go back to normal. It does seem that 160 MHz still works even. >> >> Is this expected? > > Thanks for the report. Removing this from the regression tracking after mentioning the intent to do so due to the tricky striation in my last report to Linus. #regzbot inconclusive: tricky situation, no simple way out afaics #regzbot ignore-activity Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
