> -----Original Message----- > From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 3:32 PM > To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kevin Yang <kevin_yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] wifi: rtw89: update to follow regulations of China and Thailand > > Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Recently regulations of China and Thailand are changed, and these chips > > have gotten new certifications, so apply new TX power tables. > > > > Zong-Zhe Yang (4): > > wifi: rtw89: regd: configure Thailand in regulation type > > wifi: rtw89: 8852c: update TX power tables to R67 > > wifi: rtw89: 8852b: update TX power tables to R35 > > wifi: rtw89: 8851b: update TX power tables to R34 > > I don't see patch 2 in patchwork but I did receive it to my > kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx adddress, maybe it was too big for the list? Yes, I think so. I noted that patch 2 was received late from linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, so I checked the size and found that was too big. I was trying to split the patch, but minutes later I received it. I think I should add a rule to my local script to check if patch size is larger than 500k to prevent this again. > > But I can also apply that manually so no need to split that patch. > Thank you. Ping-Ke
