Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC] mac80211: remove ieee80211_notify_mac

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 16:32 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:

> IMHO Not the concept but the implementation of this function is wrong.

I disagree.

> It should be no implementation difference between mac notification and
> reception of one RX frames that triggers oneof the connection step
> such as association response. If this would be handled in this context
> and there won't be any locking issue.
> If driver crashes internally and lost association info it can generate
> "local disassociation frame" and mac will try to reapply association
> in a regular flow.

The point is that the whole thing about disassociation is already the
wrong assumption. As I've outlined, it only works in STA mode, and thus
the function is generally not very useful.

> I agree that resume/suspend shell be handled properly in the mac80211
> regardless of this issue.

And it will handle the "firmware crashed" case perfectly too.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux