On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 10:07:33 +0300 (MSK) Ранд Дееб <deeb.rand@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 1- Yes, I agree that your solution is simpler, and I thought about > it, but I thought that the one who set the value zero put it for some > reason, so I did not want to change it. Yes, I understand your reasoning and I had the same thought initially. But I looked into the code and I am pretty sure that there is no reason for the default case returning 0. In fact, I think returning a 1 as default makes much more sense as the default value for a factor. Changing this from 0 to 1 will get my ack. -- Michael Büsch https://bues.ch/
Attachment:
pgpdgJvKCycGi.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
