Hi, On 8/29/23 15:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Currently struct ieee80211_tim_ie defines: u8 virtual_map[1]; Per the guidance in [1] change this to be a flexible array. As a result of this change, adjust all related struct size tests to account for the fact that the sizeof(struct ieee80211_tim_ie) now accounts for the minimum size of the virtual_map. [1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- diff --git a/include/linux/ieee80211.h b/include/linux/ieee80211.h index bd2f6e19c357..4cdc2eb98f16 100644 --- a/include/linux/ieee80211.h +++ b/include/linux/ieee80211.h @@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ struct ieee80211_tim_ie { u8 dtim_period; u8 bitmap_ctrl; /* variable size: 1 - 251 bytes */ - u8 virtual_map[1]; + u8 virtual_map[]; } __packed;
Uhh, the 802.11 (my 2012 Version has this in) spec in 8.4.2.7 TIM Element demands this to be 1 - 251 bytes. And this is why there's a comment above... With your change this could be confusing. Would it be possible to fix that somehow? Like in a anonymous union/group with a flexible array and a u8? Cheers, Christian
