Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 1:36 PM
>> To: Timlee <timlee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Kalle Valo
>> <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: fix a width vs precision bug
>>
>> The "buf" is skb->data that comes from the firmware. We want to print
>> "len" number of bytes. But there is a missing period so the "len"
>> variable is used for formatting (width) instead of limiting the output
>> (precision).
>>
>> Fixes: cad2bd8a136c ("wifi: rtw89: support firmware log with formatted text")
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for the fix.
>
> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Weird, Ping's reply didn't go to patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/0700c7b9-bfd3-4aa6-82bf-5bf3c74644e1@moroto.mountain/
But I do see it on the list:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/63f8219b49604fc9805319c391ee44bf@xxxxxxxxxxx/
Crossing fingers that this was just a random anomaly in patchwork and
it's not losing more email.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
