On Thu, 2023-08-17 at 14:30 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > I don't really think this is stable material - if there's a driver > > > that's calling this when >64 frames is supported then it's a driver bug > > > that should be fixed, and if not then there's no bug? > > > > I'll remove this. > > Actually I don't know - do you have a driver that's actually supporting > > 64 BlockAck on stable? I don't have that one. Actually the code can work well, even though it has drawback found by UBSAN. So, I thought maybe some drivers work under that situation. > > Just send the patch as it was? > I will. Ping-Ke
