On 8/11/2023 5:03 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 11:51 +0800, Wen Gong wrote:
Now there are many nl80211_band such as NL80211_BAND_2GHZ/
NL80211_BAND_5GHZ/NL80211_BAND_6GHZ... In the same interface, if some bands
support EML, and other bands not support EML, then how to handler this
case?
But ... these are MLD capabilities, not of the (associated) STA?
Yes, I know it.
So not sure how that would make sense? What would you even _do_ with
that?
I think another change is not move "u16 eml_capabilities", and only add
a new
field "u16 eml_supp_bands" together with the "u16 eml_capabilities", the
eml_supp_bands is filled with the bit map of enum nl80211_band. Is that OK?
johannes
