On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 7:55 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > On 8/1/23 16:37, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> Using brcmfmac with 6.5-rc3 on a brcmfmac43241b4-sdio triggers > >>> a backtrace caused by the following field-spanning error: > >>> > >>> memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 120) of single field > >>> "¶ms_le->channel_list[0]" at > >>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c:1072 (size 2) > >>> > >>> Fix this by replacing the channel_list[1] declaration at the end of > >>> the struct with a flexible array declaration. > >>> > >>> Most users of struct brcmf_scan_params_le calculate the size to alloc > >>> using the size of the non flex-array part of the struct + needed extra > >>> space, so they do not care about sizeof(struct brcmf_scan_params_le). > >>> > >>> brcmf_notify_escan_complete() however uses the struct on the stack, > >>> expecting there to be room for at least 1 entry in the channel-list > >>> to store the special -1 abort channel-id. > >>> > >>> To make this work use an anonymous union with a padding member > >>> added + the actual channel_list flexible array. > >>> > >>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Looks good to me, thanks for taking care of it. Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature