Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 8/1/23 13:23, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Another problem I see that you don't always reply to review comments and >> that gives an impression that the comments are ignored. Please always >> try to reply something to the review comments, even if just a simple >> "ok" or "I don't agree because...". > > Looking through my e-mails for the previous month, I was unable to find an > unanswered review. Could you please provide an example? I'll fix it > ASAP. You have sent so many patches and I don't have time to start go through them. Maybe I noticed that with some of mwifiex patches, not sure. But that doesn't matter, I just hope that in the future you reply to comments. > I don't want to speculate around the workflow of others and realize > that someone (especially the maintainer) may be overloaded and too > busy. OTOH it's not quite clear why the trivial things like > https://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=169030215701718&w=2 stalls for > almost a week. Should I consider this as "ignored" too? A delay of week is business as usual, I have patches in queue which are from last October: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?series=684424&state=* Remember that this is not a 24/7 service and we just had a summer break. I have 160 patches in patchwork right so expect long delays but you can check the status from patchwork yourself: https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#checking_state_of_patches_from_patchwork -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
