Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 10:44:56 +0800 Pink Perfect wrote:
>> Sorry, forgot to change the signoff name, after you review this patch I can
>> submit a new one
>
> Do you mean change to "Pink Perfect", is that the name you'd sign
> legal documents with?
>
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:37 AM pinkperfect <pinkperfect2021@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Make sure mwifiex_process_mgmt_packet and its callers
>> > mwifiex_process_sta_rx_packet and mwifiex_process_uap_rx_packet
>> > not out-of-bounds access the skb->data buffer.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 2dbaf751b1de ("mwifiex: report received management frames to
>> > cfg80211")
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: pinkperfect <pinkperfect2021@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> No empty lines between tags, please.
>
> You mentioned reporting the problem to chromeos, since mwifiex
> "maintainters" seem to be AWoL, would someone from their team
> possibly be willing to venture a review tag for the patch?
We have four maintainers for mwifiex and total silence:
MARVELL MWIFIEX WIRELESS DRIVER
M: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@xxxxxxxxx>
M: Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@xxxxxxxxx>
M: Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@xxxxxxx>
M: Xinming Hu <huxinming820@xxxxxxxxx>
L: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
S: Maintained
F: drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/
I'm very close of marking this driver as orphan unless anyone steps up.
This is not how to maintain a driver.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
