Hi, I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it: > Linux version 6.5.0-rc1+ - up to 831fe284d8275987596b7d640518dddba5735f61 > > [ 7.312665] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 7.312671] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 659 at mm/page_alloc.c:4453 __alloc_pages+0x329/0x340 > [ 7.312683] Modules linked in: exfat ntfs3 bnep btusb btrtl btbcm btintel btmtk bluetooth ecdh_generic ecc iwlmvm mac80211 libarc4 snd_hda_codec_hdmi iwlwifi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic ledtrig_audio cfg80211 snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep intel_rapl_msr x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp snd_hda_core tpm_tis intel_rapl_common snd_intel_dspcfg tpm_tis_core idma64 rfkill tpm_crb tpm rng_core pkcs8_key_parser fuse dmi_sysfs > [ 7.312725] CPU: 8 PID: 659 Comm: kworker/8:2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1 #1 > [ 7.312729] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC12WSKi7/NUC12WSBi7, BIOS WSADL357.0087.2023.0306.1931 03/06/2023 > [ 7.312731] Workqueue: events cfg80211_wiphy_work [cfg80211] > [ 7.312785] RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x329/0x340 > [ 7.312791] Code: a8 44 89 e6 89 df c6 45 c8 00 4c 89 6d b0 41 89 de e8 0b ef ff ff 49 89 c7 e9 90 fe ff ff 80 e3 3f eb c0 c6 05 69 49 f7 09 01 <0f> 0b eb 98 e8 1e ec 6d 01 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f > [ 7.312794] RSP: 0018:ffffad8e80defbf8 EFLAGS: 00010246 > [ 7.312798] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000040dc0 RCX: 0000000000000000 > [ 7.312800] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000040dc0 > [ 7.312802] RBP: ffffad8e80defc50 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000018 > [ 7.312804] R10: ffff938899d4a800 R11: ffff938891a9c800 R12: 0000000000000034 > [ 7.312806] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffffc02b150d R15: fffffffffffffc90 > [ 7.312808] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff938fb6600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [ 7.312811] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [ 7.312813] CR2: 00007f540c94b710 CR3: 000000059502c000 CR4: 0000000000f50ea0 > [ 7.312815] PKRU: 55555554 > [ 7.312817] Call Trace: > [ 7.312819] <TASK> > [ 7.312822] ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 > [ 7.312827] ? __warn+0x89/0x140 > [ 7.312833] ? __alloc_pages+0x329/0x340 > [ 7.312837] ? report_bug+0x15d/0x180 > [ 7.312843] ? handle_bug+0x42/0x80 > [ 7.312848] ? exc_invalid_op+0x1c/0x70 > [ 7.312852] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 > [ 7.312857] ? cfg80211_scan_6ghz+0x12d/0xcb0 [cfg80211] > [ 7.312911] ? __alloc_pages+0x329/0x340 > [ 7.312916] ? cfg80211_scan_6ghz+0x12d/0xcb0 [cfg80211] > [ 7.312968] __kmalloc_large_node+0x7e/0x170 > [ 7.312973] __kmalloc+0xb9/0x120 > [ 7.312976] cfg80211_scan_6ghz+0x12d/0xcb0 [cfg80211] > [ 7.313028] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0xd/0x20 > [ 7.313034] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x14/0x190 > [ 7.313040] ? raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x12/0x20 > [ 7.313046] ___cfg80211_scan_done+0x1e0/0x250 [cfg80211] > [ 7.313099] __cfg80211_scan_done+0x23/0x30 [cfg80211] > [ 7.313153] cfg80211_wiphy_work+0xae/0xd0 [cfg80211] > [ 7.313201] process_one_work+0x1f1/0x3e0 > [ 7.313204] worker_thread+0x51/0x3f0 > [ 7.313207] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x26/0x30 > [ 7.313212] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 > [ 7.313217] kthread+0xdb/0x110 > [ 7.313222] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > [ 7.313226] ret_from_fork+0x3e/0x60 > [ 7.313229] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > [ 7.313233] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 > [ 7.313237] </TASK> > [ 7.313239] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- See Bugzilla for the full thread. Anyway, I'm adding it to regzbot to make sure it doesn't fall through cracks unnoticed: #regzbot introduced: v6.5-rc1..831fe284d82759 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217675 Thanks. [1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217675 -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
