On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 07:55:15AM -0700, Mina Almasry wrote: > Once the skb frags with struct new_abstraction are in the TCP stack, > they will need some special handling in code accessing the frags. But > my RFC already addressed that somewhat because the frags were > inaccessible in that case. In this case the frags will be both > inaccessible and will not be struct pages at all (things like > get_page() will not work), so more special handling will be required, > maybe. It seems sort of reasonable, though there will be interesting concerns about coherence and synchronization with generial purpose DMABUFs that will need tackling. Still it is such a lot of churn and weridness in the netdev side, I think you'd do well to present an actual full application as justification. Yes, you showed you can stick unordered TCP data frags into GPU memory sort of quickly, but have you gone further with this to actually show it is useful for a real world GPU centric application? BTW your cover letter said 96% utilization, the usual server configuation is one NIC per GPU, so you were able to hit 1500Gb/sec of TCP BW with this? Jason
