Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath10k: fix PCI and SNOC RX pipe operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/13/2023 9:00 AM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
Since 'mod_timer()' expects expiration time in jiffies, add
missing 'msecs_to_jiffies()' in 'ath10k_pci_rx_post_pipe()'
and 'ath10k_snoc_rx_post_pipe()'. Also simplify the loops
and fix number of loop iterations in the former (it should
be equal to 'num' (i.e. number of buffers) and not 'num + 1'.

Fixes: 728f95eef523 ("ath10k: rework posting pci rx buffers")
Fixes: a6e149a9ff03 ("ath10k: add hif start/stop methods for wcn3990 snoc layer")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c  | 16 +++++++---------
  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 14 +++++++-------
  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
index a7f44f6335fb..c004c87d3211 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
@@ -818,17 +818,15 @@ static void ath10k_pci_rx_post_pipe(struct ath10k_pci_pipe *pipe)
  	num = __ath10k_ce_rx_num_free_bufs(ce_pipe);
  	spin_unlock_bh(&ce->ce_lock);
- while (num >= 0) {
+	while (num--) {
  		ret = __ath10k_pci_rx_post_buf(pipe);
-		if (ret) {
-			if (ret == -ENOSPC)
-				break;
-			ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to post pci rx buf: %d\n", ret);
-			mod_timer(&ar_pci->rx_post_retry, jiffies +
-				  ATH10K_PCI_RX_POST_RETRY_MS);
+		if (ret)
  			break;
-		}
-		num--;
+	}
+	if (ret != -ENOSPC) {

doesn't this do incorrect processing for the case where ret == 0?

+		ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to post PCI rx buf: %d\n", ret);
+		mod_timer(&ar_pci->rx_post_retry, jiffies +
+			  msecs_to_jiffies(ATH10K_PCI_RX_POST_RETRY_MS));
  	}
  }
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
index 26214c00cd0d..9ced24b1b177 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
@@ -544,16 +544,16 @@ static void ath10k_snoc_rx_post_pipe(struct ath10k_snoc_pipe *pipe)
  	spin_lock_bh(&ce->ce_lock);
  	num = __ath10k_ce_rx_num_free_bufs(ce_pipe);
  	spin_unlock_bh(&ce->ce_lock);
+
  	while (num--) {
  		ret = __ath10k_snoc_rx_post_buf(pipe);
-		if (ret) {
-			if (ret == -ENOSPC)
-				break;
-			ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to post rx buf: %d\n", ret);
-			mod_timer(&ar_snoc->rx_post_retry, jiffies +
-				  ATH10K_SNOC_RX_POST_RETRY_MS);
+		if (ret)
  			break;
-		}
+	}
+	if (ret != -ENOSPC) {

doesn't this do incorrect processing for the case where ret == 0?

+		ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to post SNOC rx buf: %d\n", ret);
+		mod_timer(&ar_snoc->rx_post_retry, jiffies +
+			  msecs_to_jiffies(ATH10K_SNOC_RX_POST_RETRY_MS));
  	}
  }




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux