Sure. I found that the related code is from Linux-2.6.12-rc2. In this situation, the 'Fixes' tag should be 'Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")'? Yu Hao On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 12:54 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 16:50 -0700, Yu Hao wrote: > > The struct cap_rid should be initialized by function readCapabilityRid. > > However, there is not return value check. Iit is possible that > > the function readCapabilityRid returns error code and cap_rid.softCap > > is not initialized. But there is a read later for this field. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yu Hao <yhao016@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c > > b/drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c > > index 7c4cc5f5e1eb..b3736d76a5d5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c > > @@ -6950,8 +6950,11 @@ static int airo_get_range(struct net_device *dev, > > CapabilityRid cap_rid; /* Card capability info */ > > int i; > > int k; > > + int status; > > > > - readCapabilityRid(local, &cap_rid, 1); > > + status = readCapabilityRid(local, &cap_rid, 1); > > + if (status != SUCCESS) > > + return ERROR; > > This value is returned directly to the network stack, you must use a > standard error code instead (e.g. -EINVAL). > > Also, please add a suitable 'Fixes' tag, thanks! > > Paolo >