Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Propagate EHT capabilities to the userspace using a new member
> 'eht_cap' in structure ieee80211_sband_iftype_data.
>
> MCS-NSS capabilities are copied depending on the supported bandwidths
> for the given band.
>
> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
> Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu<quic_pradeepc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> +static void ath12k_mac_copy_eht_ppet_ru(u32 ppet, u8 ppe_thres[], int ru)
> +{
> + int i;
> + u32 val = 0;
> + u8 ppet_size_ru = IEEE80211_EHT_PPE_THRES_INFO_PPET_SIZE * 2;
> + u8 bit = IEEE80211_EHT_PPE_THRES_INFO_HEADER_SIZE;
> +
> + u32p_replace_bits(&val, ppet >> (ru * ppet_size_ru),
> + GENMASK(ppet_size_ru - 1, 0));
> +
> + val = ((val >> IEEE80211_EHT_PPE_THRES_INFO_PPET_SIZE) & GENMASK(2, 0)) |
> + ((val & GENMASK(2, 0)) << IEEE80211_EHT_PPE_THRES_INFO_PPET_SIZE);
This shifting of val looks weird. I didn't check the spec, what does it
do? Is there any cleaner way to do this? And should have a define for
GENMASK(2, 0)?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
