Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 02/15] wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: debugfs: add entry for setting maximum TXOP time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 12:03 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 18:51 +0300, gregory.greenman@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Add an entry for setting the maximum TXOP time in microseconds.
> > The configured value can be read from the same entry.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs-vif.c  | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/mvm.h  |  3 ++
> >  .../net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs-fw.c    |  3 ++
> >  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs-vif.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs-vif.c
> > index 3613b1fdc5d9..762bce70e262 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs-vif.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs-vif.c
> > @@ -679,6 +679,42 @@ static ssize_t iwl_dbgfs_quota_min_read(struct file *file,
> >         return simple_read_from_buffer(user_buf, count, ppos, buf, len);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static ssize_t iwl_dbgfs_max_tx_op_write(struct ieee80211_vif *vif, char *buf,
> > +                                        size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > +       struct iwl_mvm_vif *mvmvif = iwl_mvm_vif_from_mac80211(vif);
> > +       struct iwl_mvm *mvm = mvmvif->mvm;
> > +       u16 value;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       ret = kstrtou16(buf, 0, &value);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               return ret;
> > +
> > +       mutex_lock(&mvm->mutex);
> > +       mvmvif->max_tx_op = value;
> > +       mutex_unlock(&mvm->mutex);
> 
> This is a strange debugfs file, it only takes effect the next time
> iwl_mvm_rs_fw_rate_init() is called, which can be kind of random? Seems
> like it should force a reinit?
> 
> johannes

You're right. We need to add some fixes to this commit.
Let's drop it meanwhile, I'll send a new version later.
I've verified that there're no any conflicts without this patch.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux