From: Mukesh Sisodiya <mukesh.sisodiya@xxxxxxxxx>
While vif pointers are protected by the corresponding "*active"
fields, static checkers can get confused sometimes. Add an explicit
check.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Sisodiya <mukesh.sisodiya@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/power.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/power.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/power.c
index ac1dae52556f..19839cc44eb3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/power.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/power.c
@@ -647,30 +647,32 @@ static void iwl_mvm_power_set_pm(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
return;
/* enable PM on bss if bss stand alone */
- if (vifs->bss_active && !vifs->p2p_active && !vifs->ap_active) {
+ if (bss_mvmvif && vifs->bss_active && !vifs->p2p_active &&
+ !vifs->ap_active) {
bss_mvmvif->pm_enabled = true;
return;
}
/* enable PM on p2p if p2p stand alone */
- if (vifs->p2p_active && !vifs->bss_active && !vifs->ap_active) {
+ if (p2p_mvmvif && vifs->p2p_active && !vifs->bss_active &&
+ !vifs->ap_active) {
p2p_mvmvif->pm_enabled = true;
return;
}
- if (vifs->bss_active && vifs->p2p_active)
+ if (p2p_mvmvif && bss_mvmvif && vifs->bss_active && vifs->p2p_active)
client_same_channel =
iwl_mvm_have_links_same_channel(bss_mvmvif, p2p_mvmvif);
- if (vifs->bss_active && vifs->ap_active)
+ if (bss_mvmvif && ap_mvmvif && vifs->bss_active && vifs->ap_active)
ap_same_channel =
iwl_mvm_have_links_same_channel(bss_mvmvif, ap_mvmvif);
/* clients are not stand alone: enable PM if DCM */
if (!(client_same_channel || ap_same_channel)) {
- if (vifs->bss_active)
+ if (bss_mvmvif && vifs->bss_active)
bss_mvmvif->pm_enabled = true;
- if (vifs->p2p_active)
+ if (p2p_mvmvif && vifs->p2p_active)
p2p_mvmvif->pm_enabled = true;
return;
}
--
2.38.1
