On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 13:02 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Sunday 09 November 2008 10:03:58 Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 09:56 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > I think you forgot to attach the patch. > > > > Sorry, I missed your second mail. (btw, if you generate patches with -p > > in diff arguments it helps a bit reading them) > > > > Ok so it looks like the buffer you're getting is unaligned. This is > > strange, but I'm too unfamiliar with the code. It seems that there's the > > PLCP 5 byte header in front. Well, try the printk I asked for, because > > at that point zd1211 should avoid "leaking" the alignment problem. > > zd1211rw has some code to align the packet to a 4-byte boundary. > But the compare_ether_addr() and the other le16 accesses are done before > that realignment. > This these blow up if (ieee80211_is_data_qos(fc) ^ ieee80211_has_a4(fc)) Well, yes, however, then his patch should have fixed the whole thing, which it didn't. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
