On Sunday 09 November 2008 04:06:14 Shaddy Baddah wrote: > Looking into this, and the underlying problem is again > compare_ether_addr(). Now, I'm sure that replacing this with a memcmp() > is now treading on more toes than just zd1211rw users. And for this > reason, I think a better solution is going to be required. I think this requires a comment in the code why we do not use compare_ether_addr() at this place. Something like: /* We use memcmp() instead of compare_ether_addr(), because the * packet might not be 4-byte aligned, yet. This is done later. */ -- Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
