On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:50:22AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > On 5/23/23 3:32 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 04:37:43PM -0700, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Report tx/rx error codes, nss, mcs, bandwidth, mode, he types, > > > tx ampdu length histogram. > > > > > > To provide some clues about how transmit and receive path is > > > actually working. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > v3: Combine tx and rx ethtool patches into single patch. > > > Fix some stats calculations, especially the path that consumes > > > tx frames based on block-ack receipt. > > > > > > Comparing the stats with expected values now matches better, but > > > hard to verify everything exactly. > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > I am a little (lot) confused about what tree/branch this patch applies to. > > > > It is against upstream iwlwifi-backports driver. I need to use that to > use latest Intel radio, and in general flow of patches seems to be > iwlwif-backports -> kernel, so I was hoping the patch had a chance that > way. I'm sure it could also be patched into the kernel with a bit of > work, and I'll be happy to do that work if that will make patch > acceptable. Thanks Ben, got it.
