Ramya Gnanasekar <quic_rgnanase@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: P Praneesh <quic_ppranees@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > In order to support different power levels of 6 GHz AP and client, > new WMI event for regulatory (WMI_REG_CHAN_LIST_CC_EXT_EVENTID) has been > added in firmware to provide new parameters required for 6 GHz regulatory rules. > > Firmware advertises its capability of handling new event in WMI service ready > event. Based on that, host needs to set host_service_flags in WMI init command > to indicate that host supports processing of this WMI event. > Based on advertised host capability, firmware sends event (WMI_REG_CHAN_LIST_CC_EXT_EVENTID). > This new event contains 2G/5G/6G reg rules with additional power value > fields for 6GHz and regd is built accordingly. > > Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0-02903-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 > > Signed-off-by: P Praneesh <quic_ppranees@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ramya Gnanasekar <quic_rgnanase@xxxxxxxxxxx> I made some changes in the pending branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=a483b258992f80c657ed3175293a15cac4acd25d > @@ -3403,6 +3403,10 @@ int ath12k_wmi_cmd_init(struct ath12k_base *ab) > struct ath12k_wmi_base *wmi_sc = &ab->wmi_ab; > struct ath12k_wmi_init_cmd_arg arg = {}; > > + if (test_bit(WMI_TLV_SERVICE_REG_CC_EXT_EVENT_SUPPORT, > + ab->wmi_ab.svc_map)) > + arg.res_cfg.is_reg_cc_ext_event_supported = 1; is_reg_cc_ext_event_supported is bool so I changed this to true. > +static int ath12k_wmi_tlv_services_parser(struct ath12k_base *ab, > + u16 tag, u16 len, > + const void *ptr, > + void *data) > { > - const void **tb; > const struct wmi_service_available_event *ev; > - int ret; > + u32 *wmi_ext2_service_bitmap; > int i, j; > + u16 expected_len; > > - tb = ath12k_wmi_tlv_parse_alloc(ab, skb->data, skb->len, GFP_ATOMIC); > - if (IS_ERR(tb)) { > - ret = PTR_ERR(tb); > - ath12k_warn(ab, "failed to parse tlv: %d\n", ret); > - return; > + expected_len = WMI_SERVICE_SEGMENT_BM_SIZE32 * sizeof(u32); > + if (len < expected_len) { > + ath12k_warn(ab, "invalid len %d for the tag 0x%x\n", > + len, tag); > + return -EINVAL; > } I changed the warning to be more descriptive. > - ev = tb[WMI_TAG_SERVICE_AVAILABLE_EVENT]; > - if (!ev) { > - ath12k_warn(ab, "failed to fetch svc available ev"); > - kfree(tb); > - return; > - } > + switch (tag) { > + case WMI_TAG_SERVICE_AVAILABLE_EVENT: > + ev = (struct wmi_service_available_event *)ptr; > + for (i = 0, j = WMI_MAX_SERVICE; > + i < WMI_SERVICE_SEGMENT_BM_SIZE32 && j < WMI_MAX_EXT_SERVICE; > + i++) { > + do { > + if (le32_to_cpu(ev->wmi_service_segment_bitmap[i]) & > + BIT(j % WMI_AVAIL_SERVICE_BITS_IN_SIZE32)) > + set_bit(j, ab->wmi_ab.svc_map); > + } while (++j % WMI_AVAIL_SERVICE_BITS_IN_SIZE32); > + } > > - /* TODO: Use wmi_service_segment_offset information to get the service > - * especially when more services are advertised in multiple service > - * available events. > - */ > - for (i = 0, j = WMI_MAX_SERVICE; > - i < WMI_SERVICE_SEGMENT_BM_SIZE32 && j < WMI_MAX_EXT_SERVICE; > - i++) { > - do { > - if (le32_to_cpu(ev->wmi_service_segment_bitmap[i]) & > - BIT(j % WMI_AVAIL_SERVICE_BITS_IN_SIZE32)) > - set_bit(j, ab->wmi_ab.svc_map); > - } while (++j % WMI_AVAIL_SERVICE_BITS_IN_SIZE32); > + ath12k_dbg(ab, ATH12K_DBG_WMI, > + "wmi_ext_service_bitmap 0:0x%x, 1:0x%x, 2:0x%x, 3:0x%x", > + ev->wmi_service_segment_bitmap[0], > + ev->wmi_service_segment_bitmap[1], > + ev->wmi_service_segment_bitmap[2], > + ev->wmi_service_segment_bitmap[3]); I changed the debug messages to the recommended style. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches