The rationale etc. didn't change in v2, so see https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230510160428.175409-1-johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In v2 I dropped the workqueue locking patch and consequently made new wiphy_work and wiphy_delayed_work things. I kept the pause/resume for the workqueue because not that I had it, it seemed simpler than keeping track of "should it be paused" in a separate bool variable to not queue the work when it shouldn't be ... Still just serves to illustrate things, I didn't really test it. johannes
