On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 20:25 +0800, Wen Gong wrote: > On 5/10/2023 7:24 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 19:06 +0800, Wen Gong wrote: > > > On 4/11/2023 3:38 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 11:28 +0800, Wen Gong wrote: > > > > > May I also add a field such as "u16 active_links_count" in struct > > > > > wiphy_iftype_ext_capab, > > > > > and add logic in function ieee80211_set_vif_links_bitmaps() for station > > > > > like this ?: > > > > > if (active_links_count && hweight16(links) <= active_links_count) > > > > > then sdata->vif.active_links = links; > > > > > > > > > Also here, not sure it makes sense in cfg80211 level? > > > > > > > > Though I'm not sure what the idea here is at all - you can refuse to > > > > link switch etc, what would you use this for? > > > > > > > > Then again, we haven't really designed out all the link selection stuff, > > > > do we want wpa_s to do it, driver to do it, etc.? Hence debugfs. So > > > > depending on what end up doing there, we will obviously need to > > > > advertise some level of link-concurrency to userspace. > > > So will you plan to do something to let wpa_s/userspace app > > > active/deactive links? > > > > > > Or you already have implemented that? > > > > > No plans right now, and honestly not sure what the right thing even is. > OK. For "advertise some level of link-concurrency to userspace", do you > have any plan/idea? No, not really. johannes >
