Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > These workqueues only host a single work item and thus doen't need explicit > concurrency limit. Let's use the default @max_active. This doesn't cost > anything and clearly expresses that @max_active doesn't matter. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Xinming Hu <huxinming820@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I didn't review the patch but I assume it's ok. Feel free to take it via your tree: Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> Patch set to Not Applicable. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20230509015032.3768622-3-tj@xxxxxxxxxx/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
