On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:54 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:47 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: >> > >> >> The problem with missing A band is that this info was supplied to >> >> driver too late. after registration otherwise >> >> the iwlwifi dealt properly with missing band This was change in design >> >> that wasn't reflected in the driver. >> >> >> >> This can happen _regardless_ of the setting of old regulatory, >> >> >> >> With old regulatory the channel was known prior to registration >> > >> > Ah, you mean the driver wasn't updated (and previously not prepared) to >> > handle changing regulatory information? >> >> Yep. > > That's fixed now though, right? At least I thought it was fixed by some > change but I can't seem to find it now. Yeah it's fixed but if someone will disable the same way G band it will fail. Should never happen though Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
